It is recommended to switch page set up to 'lanscape' for printing.
Is the Archdiocese of Miami Heading Towards Bankruptcy?
Since the Archbishop owns the parish property, it is questionable how the parishes can independently obtain loans without the Archbishop’s prior approval. No doubt any banks making such loans will require mortgages encumbering the parish property. Since by Canon law the laity has no decision making authority, it seems rather naïve to expect them to agree to encumber the parish property, or to pay for these loans. Therefore, the real intent of the Archbishop must be to set the groundwork for offsetting amounts due from the parishes’ savings accounts. (As there is no indication in the financial statement that these funds are held in trust accounts, the actual use of these monies may have already occurred.) One questions whether the Archbishop has the authority under Canon law to do this. Specifically, Canon 1267 §3 requires “offerings given by the faithful for a certain purpose may only be applied for that purpose.” A significant part of savings may have arisen from the Vision 2000 program. Moreover, Canon §537 mandates that each parish is to have a finance council who “are to assist the pastor in the administration of the goods of the parish.” (see also Canon 1280 and 1281). The Archdiocese has not enforced this requirement throughout the years. Therefore, any debt incurred by a pastor on behalf of the parish, without the prior requisite consultation with the parishes’ mandated finance council, should be deemed a nullity and the Archdiocese should be held responsible for failing to implement or enforce Canon law.
|